Skip to main content
HomeMapping Sociology in Australia
The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) Report 2025

Mapping
Sociology
in Australia

The most comprehensive discipline-specific account of Australian sociology — examining research strength, public investment, staffing, enrolments, and graduate outcomes.

28 Universities assessed at or above world standard for sociology research
$140M Australian Research Council (ARC) public investment in sociology research 2002–2021
25 Australian universities offering sociology as a standalone major (2023)
17 Universities contributing focus group data across 5 sessions
Executive Summary

A discipline of demonstrable quality and genuine breadth — facing structural challenges that demand strategic action

01
✦

Research Excellence

100% of assessed Australian sociology departments met or exceeded global research standards in the 2018 Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) evaluation — a stronger result than the broader parent category, Studies in Human Society (SiHS). Research specialisations span nineteen distinct fields, with Indigenous Sociology, Migration, Ethnicity & Multiculturalism, and Sociology of Health among the most prominent, demonstrating a discipline that is both globally competitive and deeply engaged with pressing social issues.

02
◆

Public Funding Leadership

Sociology ranked 5th among 55 Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) disciplines in ARC funding 2002–2021, receiving over $140 million and leading all SiHS disciplines. However, 60% of this funding was concentrated in just the 'Group of Eight' (Go8) universities (The University of Melbourne, Australian National University, The University of Sydney, The University of Queensland, The University of Western Australia, The University of Adelaide, Monash University, and UNSW Sydney) — a structural inequity with consequences for the broader disciplinary ecosystem.

03
▲

A Discipline Under Pressure

Sociology headcount declined 1.9% between 2015 and 2018, against sector averages that grew significantly over the same period. The ERA assessment has now been discontinued, meaning updated, discipline-specific staffing data no longer exists. Simultaneously, sociology-named organisational units are disappearing across universities as discrete departments merge into broader, interdisciplinary schools, diluting the discipline's institutional visibility.

04
●

A Sector-Wide Data Blindspot

No participating university could provide employment data specific to sociology graduates. Government data on PhD completions is unreliable due to generic classification codes. The Graduate Outcomes Survey (GOS) captures what graduates studied, not what they do with it — rendering sociology's diffuse, cross-sector employability completely invisible in national data systems. This severely hampers the discipline's ability to demonstrate its real-world economic and social impact.

"The boundary-work of sociologists is never finished, and must be conducted on the basis of good information. This means improving the knowledge sociologists have about their own discipline, and encouraging them to have a more positive image of the discipline's strengths."
Collyer & Williams Veazey (2021), Journal of Sociology — the call to which this report responds

What the evidence shows

This report investigates sociology across four domains: research and teaching strength, public investment, staffing profiles, and graduate employment outcomes. The findings reveal both notable strengths and urgent structural vulnerabilities.

100%

All assessed institutions at or above world standard

Every institution producing sufficient sociological research output met the ERA benchmark — an improvement on 2015 and 2012 and stronger than the SiHS average of 79%.

10:1

Sociology PhDs publish outside the discipline

Burns & Rajčan (2021) found sociology PhD students publish in non-sociology journals at a ten-to-one ratio, reflecting the discipline's cross-sectoral reach — and the limits of existing measurement frameworks.

5th

Among 55 HaSS disciplines in ARC funding

$140 million over 20 years, ranking above political science, demography, human geography and anthropology. Yet HaSS collectively received only 19.3% of total ARC funding — against Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)'s 77.9%.

-1.9%

Headcount decline 2015–2018

While sociology maintained a higher-than-average staffing profile, its headcount shrank against sector averages that grew 5.6% (SiHS) and 12.9% (all fields) over the same period. Post-COVID data does not exist.

-16.7%

Fall in Society & Culture 1st preferences 2021–2025

From 18,643 to 15,536 first-preference applications — but the pattern mirrors sector-wide trends attributable to the post-COVID labour market, not Job-Ready Graduates (JRG) fee increases, per Norton (2024; 2025).

Zero

Universities with sociology-specific graduate outcome data

Not one of the 19 participating institutions could provide employment data specific to sociology graduates. The GOS cannot distinguish what graduates do with their sociology training. A systemic failure across the sector.

Research strength, specialisation, and a discipline on the move

Australian sociology's research quality is, in the most straightforward sense, excellent. Every institution producing a sufficient volume of research in the discipline was assessed as meeting or exceeding global standards in the most recent ERA evaluation.

Focus groups revealed nineteen distinct specialisation areas, with Migration, Ethnicity and Multiculturalism emerging as the most common, followed by Sociology of Health/Illness and Cultural Sociology. These mirror TASA's own thematic group membership patterns — with each of these fields maintaining a base of more than 100 members.

"What we're doing is giving sociological frameworks and methodologies to students who will then take it into a wide range of areas including education, social work, public health, nursing, midwifery, social research." Focus Group Participant #15 (2023)

Twelve of nineteen focus group representatives (63%) described sociology as increasingly 'service orientated' — informing other disciplines rather than operating as a self-contained field. Five of those twelve indicated that sociology units are now taught 'across the university', informing areas including health, social work, law, tourism, engineering, and the natural sciences. This dual character creates both opportunity and risk for the discipline's institutional autonomy.

Key tension: A discipline whose value is demonstrated by what it does for other fields is also more vulnerable to being absorbed by them. Whether the service orientation ultimately strengthens or weakens sociology's autonomous institutional position remains an open question.

Top Sociological Research Specialisations — Focus Group Data

19 university representatives participated across 5 focus groups. Each bar shows how many institutions named that field as a research specialisation. Ten institutions reported more than one specialisation; two reported none. A total of 19 distinct specialisations were identified.

Migration, Ethnicity & Multiculturalism
5 of 16
Sociology of Health & Illness
4 of 16
Cultural Sociology
4 of 16
Genders & Sexualities
2 of 16
Sociology of Religion
2 of 16
Social & Cultural Theory
2 of 16

Remaining 13 specialisations (youth sociology, social stratification, environmental sociology, and others) were each cited by one institution. Multiple institutions reported more than one specialisation, so totals exceed 16.

Standalone Sociology Major Availability — by University Group (2023)

Nationwide, 25 of Australia's 42 universities (59.5%) offer sociology as a standalone major, with an additional 3 (7.1%) offering it as a combined major. The availability varies significantly by university grouping, with Innovative Research Universities (IRU) and the Group of Eight (Go8) offering the highest standalone availability.

Innovative Research Universities (IRU)
7 of 7 (100%)
Group of Eight (Go8)
6 of 8 (75%)
National Average (Nationwide)
25 of 42 (59.5%)
Regional Universities Network (RUN)
4 of 7 (57.1%)
Aust. Technology Network (ATN)
2 of 6 (33.3%)

14 institutions (33.3%) do not offer sociology as a major. Combined majors are present in Go8 (12.5%) and ATN (33.3%) groupings. Source: Institutional website audit, 2023.

Indigenous Sociology — A Research Strength of International Significance

Paradigm-Shifting Contributions — Not Subfields

Australian sociology has made internationally significant contributions to Indigenous scholarship — contributions that do not merely add to existing fields but actively reconstitute the discipline's foundations. This section acknowledges two scholars whose work demands explicit recognition in any serious account of Australian sociology's research strengths. Both are Indigenous women whose intellectual contributions have reshaped sociological thinking globally.

Professor Maggie Walter (Palawa) — University of Tasmania

Distinguished Professor of Sociology (Emerita) and founding member of the Maiam nayri Wingara Indigenous Data Sovereignty Collective, Professor Walter's body of work has fundamentally reshaped how Indigenous data, statistics, and knowledge production are understood internationally. Her contributions span quantitative Indigenous methodologies (Indigenous Statistics, with Andersen, 2013), data politics and Indigenous representation (Data Politics and Indigenous Representation in Australian Statistics, 2016), and the edited collection Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Policy (with Kukutai, Carroll & Rodriguez-Lonebear, 2021). As inaugural Pro Vice-Chancellor of Aboriginal Research and Leadership at the University of Tasmania, she built institutional infrastructure for Indigenous research at a national level. She is an executive member of the Global Indigenous Data Alliance, and in May 2021 was appointed Commissioner with the Victorian Yoo-rrook Justice Commission. Her co-edited Oxford Handbook of Indigenous Sociology (Walter, Kukutai, Gonzales & Henry, 2023) — authored entirely by Indigenous scholars — positions Indigenous sociology not as a subfield but as a new sociological paradigm grounded in the concept of the Indigenous Lifeworld.

Professor Aileen Moreton-Robinson (Goenpul woman, Quandamooka people) — University of Queensland

A foundational figure in critical Indigenous studies whose work sits at the intersection of Indigenous Studies and sociology, Professor Moreton-Robinson is currently Professor of Indigenous Research at the University of Queensland and a lead researcher at Australia's first Indigenous-led ARC Centre of Excellence — the Centre of Excellence for Indigenous Futures. Her landmark monograph The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty (University of Minnesota Press, 2015) — awarded the Native American and Indigenous Studies Association prize in 2016 — examines how the nation is socially constructed as a white possession, and how settler-colonial possessive logics continue to disavow Indigenous sovereignty. It has been foundational to critical whiteness studies, Indigenous Studies, and sociological scholarship internationally. She was Australia's first Indigenous Distinguished Professor, and in 2020 became the first Indigenous scholar from outside the United States to be elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Her earlier work Talkin' Up to the White Woman: Indigenous Women and Feminism (1999/2020) remains a cornerstone text across sociology, women's studies, and critical race studies.

An obligation this report takes seriously: Walter and colleagues have noted that prior Australian social sciences mapping exercises have omitted reference to Indigenous peoples, data, and Indigenous data sovereignty entirely — despite the global significance of this field. The Mapping Sociology project is conscious of this critique. Acknowledging these contributions is not a token gesture; it is a recognition that the discipline's most significant international paradigm contributions of recent decades have come from Indigenous Australian sociologists.

Indigenous Data Sovereignty Maiam nayri Wingara Collective Oxford Handbook of Indigenous Sociology (2023) The White Possessive (2015) Critical Indigenous Studies Indigenous Lifeworld Theory

Note: This section acknowledges the work of Indigenous scholars whose contributions sit at and across the boundaries of sociology, Indigenous Studies, and critical race studies. Their inclusion reflects the discipline's intellectual reach and the significance of their work to sociological scholarship — and is presented with care for the standing and integrity of the scholars named.

Strong relative position, deeply unequal distribution

Between 2002 and 2021, sociology research projects in Australia received over $140 million in ARC funding across 447 projects. This ranks sociology 5th of 55 HaSS disciplines and highest within Studies in Human Society — above political science, policy and administration, demography, human geography, and anthropology.

The dominant funding mechanism has been the Discovery Projects scheme, which accounted for 52.3% of all sociology ARC funding across the period.

Concentration risk: The Go8 universities secured 60.1% — over $84 million — of all sociology ARC funding between 2002 and 2021. Yet Rajčan & Burns (2024) found no significant difference in PhD publication quality between Go8 and non-Go8 institutions, suggesting disciplinary vitality is far more widely distributed than funding patterns imply.

The trend picture is mixed: average annual funding increased 4.4% comparing the periods 2002–2011 and 2012–2021 — but average annual project numbers fell 33%, from 26.7 to 18.0. Fewer, larger grants are concentrating funding further.

HaSS disciplines collectively received only 19.3% of total ARC National Competitive Grants Program funding, against STEM's 77.9% share. Sociology's excellence within this constrained allocation is real but insufficient to offset the structural disadvantage.

$140M

Total ARC Funding

2002–2021 across 447 projects and 35 institutions

35th

Ranked by Primary Field

Out of 157 disciplines in ARC funding levels

5th

Ranked in HaSS

Of 55 HaSS disciplines — highest in Studies in Human Society

-33%

Project Number Decline

Average annual projects dropped from 26.7 (2002–11) to 18.0 (2012–21)

ARC Funding Share — Top 10 Institutions (2002–2021)
University of Queensland
$19.7M
University of Melbourne
$18.8M
Monash University
$15.0M
UNSW Sydney
$10.8M
University of Sydney
$9.6M
ANU
$7.9M
Deakin University
$7.2M
Western Sydney University
$2.9M

A workforce picture frozen in time

The most recent available staffing data for sociology derives from the 2018 ERA evaluation, with a census date of March 2017. ERA was discontinued in 2023. No replacement framework has been implemented. Australia's discipline-level staffing infrastructure does not currently exist.

As of 2017, 658 researchers were employed in Australian sociology — placing it 2nd among Studies in Human Society disciplines (behind political science) and 34th overall, a fall from 28th in 2015.

The gender profile of Australian sociology is distinctive: women outnumber men across all full-time employment levels A through D, and in non-academic and senior administrative roles — with the exception of Level E (Professor). This contrasts sharply with all-discipline averages, where men outnumber women at most levels.

Critical gap: Rajčan & Burns (2025) document a pattern of disappearing sociology-named organisational units across Australian universities — with the discipline increasingly absorbed into interdisciplinary schools of social science. The true current state of the discipline's workforce is, at present, unknown.

658 Total sociology researchers (2017 ERA census)
2nd Ranked in Studies in Human Society by headcount
70.4% FTE employed (full-time/fractional)
7.8% Casual appointments
21.8% Other (unpaid/seconded)
Headcount Growth 2015–2018 — Sociology vs Sector
All Fields Average
+12.9%
Studies in Human Society
+5.6%
Sociology
−1.9%

ERA discontinued 2023. The framework that would ordinarily provide updated discipline-level staffing data no longer exists. Advocacy for an effective replacement — and for interim mechanisms to monitor sociology's workforce — is identified as a TASA priority.

Declining applications — but is sociology the story?

Enrolment trends for sociology specifically are largely unknowable from public data — government sources aggregate sociology into 'Society and Culture', a broad category. The trends visible in that data reflect sector-wide dynamics, not discipline-specific decline.

Did the Job-Ready Graduates package hurt sociology?

The 2020 JRG legislation more than doubled student fees for social studies-categorised courses, including sociology. By 2024, a sociology degree cost approximately $16,300 per year — over three and a half times the cost of nursing or teaching at ~$4,400.

Yet focus group evidence is surprisingly clear: of twelve participants queried directly, only two reported any reduction in sociology enrolments following JRG implementation. Seven reported no change. Two reported improvement.

Yong, Coelli & Kabatek (2023) analysed 725,000 degree applications over seven years and found only 1.52% of applicants 'swapped field' due to JRG fee changes. The Australian Universities Accord (2024) recommended replacing the package, citing its failure to achieve intended outcomes.

Focus Group Response — Impact of JRG on Sociology Enrolments

12 of the 19 university representatives were queried directly on whether JRG had changed sociology enrolments or prompted restructuring at their institution. Responses reflect qualitative institutional assessments — not statistical counts.

No change in enrolments
7 of 12
Reported a decrease
2 of 12
Reported an improvement
2 of 12
Unsure / could not confirm
1 of 12

A further 7 of the 19 participants (not included above) cited institution-specific factors — unrelated to JRG — as affecting their sociology enrolments. These included arts degree restructuring, elective cuts, and students shifting toward profession-based programs.

"The vibe is that students want to study something, they will elect to study it. The big hurdle is making the decision to go to university." Focus Group Participant #16 (2023)

The COVID and post-pandemic labour market story

The 2021 enrolment spike — visible across Society and Culture data — appears to be a COVID anomaly. With lockdowns constraining work and travel alternatives, demand for university study spiked. The subsequent 2022 cliff reflects the counter-cyclical reverse: as the labour market tightened post-pandemic, the opportunity cost of study increased.

Of ten focus group representatives queried on COVID impacts, five reported redundancies in their social science departments. Two reported curriculum revisions. One reported faculty restructuring. Only two reported no direct impact — both from institutions not reliant on international student revenue before the pandemic.

International student vulnerability: Because Australian higher education was predominantly delivered face-to-face and on-shore, border closures had an acute impact. Several institutions introduced redundancy programs that disproportionately affected social science departments.

2017–2021

Stable Society & Culture Applications

18,643 first preferences in 2021 — stable pre-pandemic demand.

2021

COVID Anomaly Spike

Enrolments lifted sector-wide as lockdowns constrained labour market alternatives. Norton (2024) identifies this as counter-cyclical demand.

2022

Post-Pandemic Labour Market Reversal

Unemployment fell to historic lows. Young adults without degrees found plentiful employment — reducing incentive to enrol. Every field bar IT saw significant decline.

2023–2025

Continued Slow Recovery — Uneven by Field

Society & Culture experienced -3.31% enrolment decline in 2023 — the steepest of any declining field. By 2025: 15,536 first preferences, down 16.7% from 2021 peak.

What the Universities Admissions Centre (UAC) and Department of Education data shows

-16.7%

1st Preference Applications

Society & Culture, 2021–2025 (18,643 → 15,536)

-8.1%

Total Enrolments

Society & Culture, 2021–2023 (322,659 → 296,654)

77.8%

Losses From Non-Year 12

Mature-age applicants drove the overwhelming majority of 1st preference losses

+3.7%

Postgraduate (Other) Growth

Society & Culture postgraduate coursework enrolments increased 2021–2023

Critical caveat: All of these figures describe Society and Culture — not sociology. This broad Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) category includes anthropology, human geography, political science, psychology, and others. These statistics are indicative of broader trends, not sociology-specific outcomes.

1st Preference Application Losses — Source (2021–2025)
Non-Year 12 (mature-age) applicants
77.8%
Year 12 school leavers
22.2%
Enrolment Change by Course Type — Society & Culture (2021–2023)
Enabling courses
-30.6%
Bachelor programs
-10.9%
Postgraduate (research)
-4.3%
Postgraduate (coursework)
+3.7%

Norton's sector-level analysis: structural decline, not fee effects

Andrew Norton's analysis of domestic commencing Equivalent Full-Time Student Load (EFTSL) data by discipline (2010–2022) provides crucial sector-level context for this report's enrolment findings. His conclusions strengthen the case that sociology-specific data is not available, and that the declines visible in Society and Culture data reflect much broader forces.

✓

Structural decline predates JRG

HaSS enrolment decline began years before 2021 fee increases, making JRG attribution analytically unreliable

✓

Counter-cyclical labour market effect

Post-COVID employment boom kept mature-age students out of universities — the 18–24 cohort saw 18% decline vs 4% for school leavers

!

Psychology inflation in S&C data

Psychology's COVID-era boom (mental health focus) may have inflated Society and Culture figures 2020–21, making the subsequent decline appear artificially steep

!

Mature-age students most sensitive

Historically most price-and-opportunity-cost sensitive — the dominant cohort in S&C application losses. Labour market, not fees, is the primary driver

The key Norton argument: It is hard to say what is JRG and what is just a trend continuing. The structural decline in humanities and social science enrolments substantially predates the legislation — and the simultaneous decline across most fields in 2022 points to common causes, not discipline-specific policy effects.

Mature-Age Enrolment Decline 2017–2023
-18%
-4%
Age 20–24
Age ≤19 school leavers

The absence of data is itself the finding

This section reports not a set of findings about what sociology graduates do — but the structural absence of any system capable of telling us. This is not an oversight of the study. It is a systemic failure across the Australian higher education sector.

📊

Graduate Outcomes Survey (GOS / GOS-L)

Captures what graduates studied, not what they do with it. Cannot distinguish a sociology graduate working as a policy analyst, community researcher, HR professional, or educator. Sociology's cross-sector employability is structurally invisible.

🎓

PhD Completion Data — "Metrics but Little Meaning"

Rajčan & Burns (2024) found that universities report sociology PhDs to the Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE) under generic Field of Education codes, not discipline-specific ones. An accurate national count of sociology doctoral completions is impossible from public data.

🏛️

Institutional Alumni Tracking

Of 19 participating universities, zero could provide employment data specific to sociology graduates. One institution had developed a LinkedIn alumni space — the sector's sole example of nascent discipline-level alumni engagement.

Why this matters more than it appears

Sociology PhD completions approximately doubled across 2010–2019 (Rajčan & Burns, 2025). The academic labour market did not grow correspondingly. An expanding cohort of highly trained sociologists is entering careers that existing data systems cannot track — deploying their expertise in health, education, government, business, and civil society, completely invisible to disciplinary accounting.

Burns & Rajčan (2021) found sociology PhDs published in non-sociology journals at a ten-to-one ratio. Sociological expertise is being produced, deployed, and disseminated across the entire intellectual landscape — but the instruments designed to evaluate this reach are not equipped to follow it.

"In an environment where employability narratives increasingly shape government funding decisions, an inability to evidence graduate outcomes constitutes a significant structural vulnerability." Mapping Sociology Report (2025), Section 3.5

Advocacy: GOS Instrument Reform

Engage with Graduate Outcomes Survey instrument design to advocate for occupational classification that captures what graduates do with their study — not just employment status and field of education.

Initiative: National Alumni Tracking

Build on the LinkedIn alumni initiative at one participating institution to develop a sector-wide sociology alumni network — potentially via consortium LinkedIn Talent Insights licensing.

Advocacy: PhD Classification Reform

Direct engagement with the Department of Education to improve Field of Education reporting for doctoral completions — so that sociology PhD graduates can be accurately counted and tracked.

Where TASA should direct its advocacy and leadership

The findings of this report are not arguments for disciplinary anxiety — they are arguments for the kind of strategic, evidence-based advocacy that TASA, as a national professional body, is uniquely positioned to lead.

As Collyer & Williams Veazey (2021) argued, improving the knowledge that sociologists have about their own discipline is a precondition for its effective representation.

01

Advocate for ERA Replacement

The discontinuation of ERA has left Australian sociology without any means of systematically monitoring its own workforce. TASA should actively engage with the replacement framework process to ensure discipline-level staffing data is restored as a matter of urgency.

02

Build Graduate Outcome Evidence

Champion reform of the GOS instrument; develop a national alumni tracking mechanism; facilitate institutional access to LinkedIn Talent Insights. Sociology must be able to account for what its graduates do — at undergraduate and doctoral levels — if it is to participate credibly in employability debates.

03

Foreground Indigenous Sociology

Ensure that the paradigm-shifting contributions of Australian Indigenous sociology scholars — particularly Walter and colleagues — are visible in every account of the discipline's research strengths, and that TASA's representational work honours this contribution explicitly.

04

Address Funding Concentration

Develop strategies to support sociology departments at regional and equity-focused universities — including by advocating for more equitable ARC grant success rates and supporting collaborative research models that can compete across institutional types.

05

Monitor the Service Discipline Tension

Whether sociology's increasing service orientation strengthens or weakens its autonomous position remains unresolved. TASA should establish mechanisms to track program offering changes over time and develop a clear advocacy position on the conditions under which service teaching can coexist with disciplinary independence.

06

Establish Longitudinal Mapping

This report provides a 2023 baseline for program offerings and a 2017 baseline for staffing. Developing the capacity to track these indicators over time — through systematic audits, TASA member surveys, and engagement with government data collection — is essential for evidence-based advocacy into the future.

Key Literature & Reports

  • Australian Universities Accord. (2024). Australian Universities Accord Final Report. Australian Government Department of Education.
  • Burns, N., & Rajčan, L. (2021). Publish or perish elsewhere: Australian sociology doctoral publication destinations. Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 845–863.
  • Collyer, F. M., & Williams Veazey, L. (2021). The state of Australian sociology: An empirical profile. Journal of Sociology, 57(3), 517–538.
  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (1999/2020). Talkin’ Up to the White Woman: Indigenous Women and Feminism. University of Queensland Press.
  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2015). The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Norton, A. (2024). Higher education enrolment trends: Assessing post-COVID labour market dynamics and policy shifts. Higher Education Policy Analysis.
  • Norton, A. (2025). Disciplines under pressure: Mapping Humanities and Social Sciences student loads across Australia (2010–2024). Policy Papers in Australian Higher Education.
  • Rajčan, L., & Burns, N. (2024). Beyond institutional tiering: PhD publication quality and doctoral outcomes in Australian sociology. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(2), 341–357.
  • Rajčan, L., & Burns, N. (2025). The institutional restructuring of Australian sociology: Departmental mergers, school reorganisations, and the fate of the discipline. Journal of Sociology, 61(1), 112–131.
  • Walter, M., & Andersen, C. (2013). Indigenous Statistics: A Quantitative Research Methodology. Left Coast Press.
  • Walter, M. (2016). Data Politics and Indigenous Representation in Australian Statistics. Routledge.
  • Walter, M., Kukutai, T., Carroll, S. R., & Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (Eds.). (2021). Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Policy. Routledge.
  • Walter, M., Kukutai, T., Gonzales, A. A., & Henry, R. (Eds.). (2023). The Oxford Handbook of Indigenous Sociology. Oxford University Press.
  • Yong, J., Coelli, M., & Kabatek, J. (2023). Price responsiveness in higher education: Evaluating the impact of the Job-Ready Graduates fee restructuring. Economics of Education Review, 94, 102391.

Mapping Sociology in Australia (2025)

Commissioned by TASA. Data sourced from ARC, UAC, Australian Government Department of Education, and focus groups with nineteen representatives of seventeen Australian universities.

Professor Alphia Possamai-Inesedy
Project Lead
Dr Rhys Gower
Project Lead